The Future Is Fluid
Liquid Biopsy Has Proven Its Mettle in the Fight against NSCLC and May Soon Also Be Standard of Care in Other Cancers
Genomics Brings Heavy Lifting to Immuno-Oncology
The Synergy of Two Burgeoning Fields Will Lead to Improved Precision Medicine
Singling Out RNA Biomarkers in Situ
ACD’s ISH Platform Achieves Single-Base Resolution and Retains Morphological Context
Microanalyte MDx Goes Mainstream
Nucleic Acid Analytes Are Reliable Sources of Data for Diagnostic Calculations
Raising the Bar for Human Clinical Trials
Standards for authorizing first-time trials of drugs in humans are lax, and should be strengthened in several ways, McGill University researchers argue in a paper published in Nature. While regulators in North America and Europe evaluate safety before human trials can proceed, they do not currently demand meaningful evidence for potential efficacy, say the investigators.
Trials of ineffective therapies place burdens on society even if research participants aren't harmed directly, the researchers argue. Drug development soaks up financial and research resources; patients and healthy volunteers involved in testing a dud treatment miss out on more promising ones; and expenses wasted on ineffective therapies are often passed on to healthcare systems in the form of higher drug prices. The argument for better scrutiny of animal studies may be especially timely, since the incoming U.S. president has indicated he intends to weaken requirements for clinical evidence of efficacy before drugs are approved.