Top 10 Wall Street Losers of 2016
These Companies Lost the Most in a Down Year for Biopharma Stocks
Reading miRNAs for Clinical Meaning
Single miRNAs Don’t Say Much, but They May Become Eloquent Biomarkers if We Take Their Testimony in Context
Sorting Out the CRISPR Patent Case
Sounds of Science Podcast
Good Assays for Bad Immunogenicity
Avoid “Bad” Immunogenicity by Using Assays That Are More Sensitive and Can Adapt to Increasingly Complex and Specialized Drugs
Nanobiotech in the U.S.
FDA’s recently enacted budget for this fiscal year included some good news for proponents of nanotechnology as well as the promise for more in the years ahead. The agency’s National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), which conducts research on new medical products like nanomaterials, was approved $60 million for fiscal 2012, flat compared to FY ’11. Sen. Mark Pryor (D-AR) also inserted language in the House-Senate conference report endorsing the development of a nanotechnology core facility. One such site became operational last fiscal year, the other is set for FY 2012. These are among efforts to maintain U.S. leadership in nanotech. Europe is the nearest-term threat, but China, Singapore, and Taiwan are among others. What are your predictions?