GEN Exclusives

More »

GEN News Highlights

More »
Feb 26, 2014

Biomarked for Death—Four Blood Proteins Can Predict Early Demise

Biomarked for Death—Four Blood Proteins Can Predict Early Demise

Source: © AKS - Fotolia.com

  • While you may appear to be healthy, you may be frailer than you know. You may even be at risk of death—from one disease or another—within the next five years. Would you want to know? You may now have the choice, thanks to researchers at the Estonian Genome Center and the Institute for Molecular Medicine, Finland.

    These researchers have developed a screening technology. It looks for four biomarkers that have been associated with a risk of dying from any disease in the near future. Ordinarily, biomarkers are used to assess an individual’s risk of developing a specific condition. The new screening technology, however, is used to reveal general frailty, even in apparently healthy people. It reflects the risk for dying, whatever the ultimate cause—heart disease, cancer, or any other condition.

    The biomarkers identified by the researchers are albumin, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, citrate, and the size of very-low-density lipoprotein particles. Of these, albumin was the only one previously linked with mortality. All these molecules are normally present in everyone's blood—the amounts of these molecules are what matter. To assess the degree to which an individual’s biomarkers are imbalanced, the researchers found a way to compile a biomarker score.

    The researchers found that individuals with a biomarker score in the top 20% had a risk of dying within five years that was 19 times greater than that of individuals with a score in the bottom 20% (288 versus 15 deaths). In addition, biomarker scores were still predictive of early death—that is, a death within the next five years—independent of well-known risk factors such as age, smoking, drinking, obesity, blood pressure, and cholesterol.

    The researchers detailed their results February 25 in PLOS Medicine, in an article entitled “Biomarker Profiling by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for the Prediction of All-Cause Mortality: An Observational Study of 17,345 Persons.” To carry out their study, the researchers relied on technology that allowed them to screen blood samples for a wide range of blood biomarkers.

    This technology, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, screened for over 100 potential biomarkers in two cohorts of healthy people. The first cohort, investigated by Estonian members of the research team, consisted of 9,842 people. So astonished by what they found, the Estonian scientists asked their Finnish colleagues to repeat the experiment. The Finnish cohort, consisting of 7,503 people, produced the same result: Just four biomarkers are predictive of cardiovascular mortality, as well as death from cancer and other nonvascular diseases.

    While the researchers emphasized that more studies would be needed before their findings could be implemented in clinical practice, they expressed optimism that their work could alert seemingly healthy people to the need for medical intervention. One of the study’s Finnish authors, Johnannes Kettunen, said, “We believe that in the future these measures can be used to identify people who appear healthy but in fact have serious underlying illnesses and guide them to proper treatment.”

    In discussing their results, the authors of the PLOS Medicine story wrote, “In spite of [this study’s] limitations, the fact that the same four biomarkers are associated with a short-term risk of death from a variety of diseases does suggest that similar underlying mechanisms are taking place. This observation points to some potentially valuable areas of research to understand precisely what's contributing to the increased risk.”



Related content

Jobs

GEN Jobs powered by HireLifeScience.com connects you directly to employers in pharma, biotech, and the life sciences. View 40 to 50 fresh job postings daily or search for employment opportunities including those in R&D, clinical research, QA/QC, biomanufacturing, and regulatory affairs.
 Searching...
More »

GEN Poll

More » Poll Results »

Block That Microbiome Metaphor!

Which way of thinking about the microbiome would best integrate the virome’s contributions?